the first election with a real chance of an outsider winning since 92.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423294/donald-trump-pat-buchanan-heir

this debate will matter much. Everyone is focus on football.  Superbowl is not that far away.

I am curios to see what the debate viewership numbers will be, if Rand isn't on stage.  The more the establishment puppets talk, they more they do themselves in.  It's  likely that they will let Paul in, say he barley made it, therefore he must be weak. It's a containment strategy. Kicking him off makes that very difficult to do.  

Rand would be able to build monstrous momentum if we were not in the Debate and perform in the top three in both Iowa and New Hampshire.  He may not win, but it builds a stronger and stronger case that the Mainstream Media is fucking irrelevant. Makes it harder for them to push a fucking puppet on us.  

It probably won't happen. But I would be LMFAS to watch the media try and spin it, if Rand wins both... somehow.  O wait, they will blame this on football.

Not sure if they will count the ARP poll, they hadn't before but they might use Monmouth which CNN counted

Rand is in a literal tie with Bush nationally and in Iowa using polls Fox has used before, in NH Rand is polling better but obviously Christie, NH is his backyard and the others like Kasuck who are picking up the Liberal votes Rubio hasn't been able to grab.  In addition, Fox would have a hard time including a Kasuck because he polls well in NH but nowhere nationally or in Iowa and not include Rand who has been either 5th or 6th nationally in about 6 polls this cycle.