Unread
Even if he has the best boots on the ground in Iowa and does win
What does everyone think is going to happen? The MSM will go crazy with headlines that Rand Paul wins Iowa? And that will set him up better for later states and polls?
More realistically what will happen, if he does pull off a win in Iowa, is that the MSM will do one of three things -
- Simply explain it away as a mere anomaly caused by a handful of zealous supporters left over from the Ron Paul days in Iowa's caucuses,
- Completely ignore it altogether, dare not mention it at all, and if they have to, it will be brief, short, without any sensationalism and not at all on prime time, or will make it seem as if it is not a big deal or skew the numbers to make it look like a lucky 'skin of the teeth' marginal win,
- Or discount the validity and importance of Iowa's caucuses altogether, as they already threatened to, and began to do when Ron did as well as he did in Iowa. I recall more than one news report back in those days where they basically explained Ron's win away and said that Iowa's credibility as a predictor may be gone (Hannity in particular if I recall correctly). So the play on that idea has already been put into motion.
We saw this in '08 and '12. Why does anyone think this time will be different with Rand? We still have the same MSM companies and the same talking heads.
Not trying to dis his win if he gets one, just reminding people with their hopes up again what they have forgotten.
If you don't have the MSM's nod of approval, your wins don't mean anything, nor will they be portrayed as if they mean anything. And if you get a leg up, FOX, CNN, and MSNBC will surely go out of their way kick it out from under you.
Until those three empires walls are torn down, liberty will continue fading into the past.
.
I had a similar thought
I wonder if this can be substantiated.
AKA Sunshine_State at Popular Liberty
If you can't trust people with freedom, how can you trust people with power?
i would not call that liberty
Making bomb threats or death threats is not protected under free speech. Making a physical bomb hoax threat is one way to get shot by someone who thought it was real. Many of these pranks that insinuate imminent mortal danger to public bystanders whether the threat is real or perceived, will result in pranksters getting hurt, shot or possibly killed by people that thought the threat was real. All for some youtube views to feed their narcissistic ego. If this death threat prank stuff becomes socially acceptable then it will lead to the mental illness that defending yourself against an attacker is socially unacceptable because it could be a prank. Which is the point of this fad or meme put out by social engineers, lapped up by narcissist youtube rejects only in it for their 15 mins of fame.
Broadcasting live from globalist occupied mother Canadastan
I'll bump you
for no reason other than your right to vote
A man who chops his own wood is warmed by it twice
My take
I will not vote for an establishment puppet. Hillary, Jeb, Rubio, and Christy are the known puppets. I would vote for Donald or Bernie over a puppet. We can do better; his name is Rand.
Puppet vs puppet? That is where we don't have any choice.
As it regard to the post subject matter. Donald is a brilliant player. Don't know where he stands. The real Trump or that fictitious Trump.
Those who are; are those whom are not.
Crabby?
My statements have been purposely twisted around on here man and the joint "agenda" has become clear. I am going to send you a private message my objective friend.
"Jack of all Trades...Master of None" But forever learning more!