Unread
God I hope so. RAND - DO NOT allow these bastards to disrespect
...you like they did your father.
And even HE was allowed into all the GOP debates.
IS LIBERTY GOING BACKWARDS???
This is very disheartening and discouraging.
Rand has nowhere near the pull his dad did and anyone who thinks that Ted Cruz is in ANY WAY related to liberty is DEAD WRONG.
Cruz said quote; "If you don't stand for Israel, then I will not stand with you." And he also claimed that if you don't support Israel (with your tax dollars) then you don't support the United States!!!
And this bastard took an oath to WHICH COUNTRY when he became a senator???
I'm off topic so I will reiterate...Rand should NOT go to the kid's table.
Since they are running out of candidates for that spot, they won't be able to keep that charade going unless Rand goes along with their plan to step down.
NO debates is better than the little kid's table which no one carea about anyway.
The only reason the lying Fiorina was moved up was to be the GOP token woman candidate.
"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed and over-regulated and overrun by bureaucrats - the founders would be ashamed." -Ron Paul
That was good, real good. It
That was good, real good. It was as nerve wracking to watch as any suspense film.
I love the site!
I love the site and it keeps getting better. One thing i notice i am doing reading the forum threads is i end up scrolling way down there. When i am done reading i have to scroll all the way back up to go to the home page. A home button near the bottom of the pages would be sweet. When i am on other sites that have them, i find that is the link i click most often. I am not sure if others do the same as me when browsing.
Broadcasting live from globalist occupied mother Canadastan
Even if he has the best boots on the ground in Iowa and does win
What does everyone think is going to happen? The MSM will go crazy with headlines that Rand Paul wins Iowa? And that will set him up better for later states and polls?
More realistically what will happen, if he does pull off a win in Iowa, is that the MSM will do one of three things -
- Simply explain it away as a mere anomaly caused by a handful of zealous supporters left over from the Ron Paul days in Iowa's caucuses,
- Completely ignore it altogether, dare not mention it at all, and if they have to, it will be brief, short, without any sensationalism and not at all on prime time, or will make it seem as if it is not a big deal or skew the numbers to make it look like a lucky 'skin of the teeth' marginal win,
- Or discount the validity and importance of Iowa's caucuses altogether, as they already threatened to, and began to do when Ron did as well as he did in Iowa. I recall more than one news report back in those days where they basically explained Ron's win away and said that Iowa's credibility as a predictor may be gone (Hannity in particular if I recall correctly). So the play on that idea has already been put into motion.
We saw this in '08 and '12. Why does anyone think this time will be different with Rand? We still have the same MSM companies and the same talking heads.
Not trying to dis his win if he gets one, just reminding people with their hopes up again what they have forgotten.
If you don't have the MSM's nod of approval, your wins don't mean anything, nor will they be portrayed as if they mean anything. And if you get a leg up, FOX, CNN, and MSNBC will surely go out of their way kick it out from under you.
Until those three empires walls are torn down, liberty will continue fading into the past.
.
I had a similar thought
I wonder if this can be substantiated.
AKA Sunshine_State at Popular Liberty
If you can't trust people with freedom, how can you trust people with power?
i would not call that liberty
Making bomb threats or death threats is not protected under free speech. Making a physical bomb hoax threat is one way to get shot by someone who thought it was real. Many of these pranks that insinuate imminent mortal danger to public bystanders whether the threat is real or perceived, will result in pranksters getting hurt, shot or possibly killed by people that thought the threat was real. All for some youtube views to feed their narcissistic ego. If this death threat prank stuff becomes socially acceptable then it will lead to the mental illness that defending yourself against an attacker is socially unacceptable because it could be a prank. Which is the point of this fad or meme put out by social engineers, lapped up by narcissist youtube rejects only in it for their 15 mins of fame.
Broadcasting live from globalist occupied mother Canadastan
I'll bump you
for no reason other than your right to vote
A man who chops his own wood is warmed by it twice
I understand the Nazi party is looking for new members
Jill should apply
"Do not neglect your music, it will be a companion which will sweeten many hours of life to you." Thomas Jefferson