Unread

BaneMaler's picture

These shifting dates of human history are always intriguing to me.

Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
Never Be Defeated! https://youtu.be/XmTmTMcdxOs

SleestaksRule's picture

"The carcass had a rounded hole through the interior jugal, deep incisions along the ribs, dents in the left scapula and a broken mandible—all indications that it was killed by human beings, and did not die of natural causes."

This is from the past.  Do not blame the humans.

.

Ron Aldof's picture

I agree, let's get this settled. I would truly like the issue to go away in the future. So we can just look at where a person is born and to whom they were born of.

I do not feel that Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen. He was not born on any part of US soil, territorial, militarily (on a US base), diplomatically, or any other connection to the USA. His parents both took up residency in Canada. They were not there on a trip or a short visit.

I ask for answers on both of these questions. (1). If Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen. Which of the 50 states would he be Natural Born to? (2). Can a war baby from Vietnam become president of the United States?

#IStandWithRandAndLiberty!
Let's get back to Liberty and Freedom.
Trump is working with the Establishment.

crabacado's picture

Did someone here offend her?

A man who chops his own wood is warmed by it twice

BaneMaler's picture

Old people show up in Iowa to see candidates up close and personal.  They don't also need to see them in a debate.  Youth are living on their computers and Rand has successfully targeted them.  He has to constently remind them that they have to get in the fight, they have short attention spans and have an issue with being reliable come voting time.  However, if you make this like a happening then they won't want to miss out and may come out in large numbers.

Rand's plan is as follows:

1/3 youth = 10K

1/3 libertarian = 10K

1/3 conservatives base= 10K

I would say he might be preaching to that potential 1/3 base by being on the stage at any point.  It is a small sliver of the overall pie though and he might already have it locked up.  To be honest I would be more comfortable hearing that he had 15-20K support from the youth in Iowa.

Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
Never Be Defeated! https://youtu.be/XmTmTMcdxOs

Ron Aldof's picture

Yesterday upon returning from my errands of the day. My son jokingly tells me there was visitor to our front door asking for a signature to place Christie on the Indiana Ballot.

You know I miss all the fun!!!!

#IStandWithRandAndLiberty!
Let's get back to Liberty and Freedom.
Trump is working with the Establishment.

VR's picture

.

All our knowledge begins with the senses, proceeds then to the understanding, and ends with reason. There is nothing higher than reason.
Immanuel Kant

Promisekept's picture

How many candidates in his position would, and could, have done the social media approach at all, much less, as effectively as he did? It is still such an underrated media coup, that even we haven't fully embraced it, yet! Let Rand list the substantive Q&A topics that came to him DURING their self-important debate, and let the gatekeepers try to discount them both.

If political science were applied to the social-media advantage Rand gained here: he ought to be positioning himself much better because of it, not in spite of it.

Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place. ― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Promisekept's picture

You concluded on such an empty observation, I felt I had to reply here, Techy.

"'Christians' do not support, 'Absolute Liberty' or we would have attained it by now. eh?" Did you know that Jesus addressed your notion directly?

Then said Jesus to those Jews that believed on him, If you continue in my word, then are you my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. - John 8:31

Messiah was teaching new disciples, who were from an intact historical AND biblical lineage: aligned with his word, then and there: that CONTINUATION in his word would prove who they were, what they would then know, and how THAT TRUTH would make them, eh?

The problem isn't that that freedom can't be found here. I dare say it is the only real place to start and actually find it. Rather, it is that continuation in his word has been abandoned by so many professing Christians; if they even bothered to read them for themselves, and pray about their implications and applications: that causes observers, like you, HVACTech, to ponder if the very faith He gave us to follow, isn't just some cleaver ruse, rather than real true life.

Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place. ― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

johncarter44's picture

"I bow my head to the beauty of music, the Blues carry my soul."

- Johncarter44

https://www.youtube.com/user/johncarter44

Freeman15's picture

The ones who don't use social media like the younger crowd.

We need more old people, like the ones who watch Faux news.

Disclaimer: I'm old as dirt.

.

The Cat's picture

If the top tier debate, then he definitely should participate. Those guys are talking about the under card debate.  A total waste of time and energy... unless, a HUGE gathering of Rand supporters showed up outside (like they did for Ron, when the Neocons freaked out at the sight). 

You mentioned Rand's "uniquely-gained, popular advantage".  That begs the question:  With whom?  Us?  Again, it wouldn't make any difference with us.  It's the majority of the FauxNews watching crowd that need to hear him and they aren't watching the kiddie table debates.

One of the things I absolutely do agree on with you is " ... what Rand did, by his effective use of available social media to pose a real dialog with the people who cared enough to access him, essentially made him the one-man winner of the real debate".

 

.

ecard71's picture

"If you want facts, you need to follow Pete Santilli"

http://www.acalltopaul.com/comment/3397#comment-3397

Thanks for the vid

I STILL STAND WITH RAND!

Brian McWilliams's picture

to take people's political views with a grain of salt when being friends with someone, but if I knew anyone who supported Chris Christie, I'd have to reconsider. 

@BrianMcWilliams
LionsofLiberty.com

Promisekept's picture

I say this before my predictive reading of their tomes. It's not that they aren't well taught by history, and other political science dynamics: but what Rand did, by his effective use of available social media to pose a real dialog with the people who cared enough to access him, essentially made him the one-man winner of the real debate as to who we ought trust with that delegated authority.

If Dr. Paul were to posture himself accordingly, it would be to ask them how his participation in any future top-card debate events might be worth the sacrifice of his uniquely-gained, popular advantage. Playing off their debate in real time, without commercial considerations served; showed all TV/Cable gatekeepers just how badly their mighty media mind-lock is broken!

Since Martin Luther King Day is our state-sponsored celebration of the prophet they slew for his stand, perhaps this song might be appropriate posting here:  [video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-rITHSrbfg]

Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place. ― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Pages