Who Really Supports the NO Restrictions At All Position on Abortion?

While I am not an absolute pacifist, I respect their positions. And a principled pacifist must reject not only all government, but any enforceable legal system, as law enforcement always requires violence. This antinomian position does not oppose laws because they support the activity the law would prohibit, but, rather because of their principled stand against all violence. Note that virtually all principled pacifists would be personally against abortion, because an abortion would require violence against the fetus, but would oppose any form of enforceable law against abortion.

We should also bring up the logical consequences of creating a libertarian legal system, even one endorsing the minimal state. One consequence of having a libertarian society would be that medical professionals would be unlicensed, therefore there would really be no means to even discover that an abortion had taken place, if the mother and her doctor chose to conceal it.

...A pregnant woman may at any time - from conception to birth - choose to evict the life she carries AS LONG AS it does not KILL or otherwise HARM the human she evicts.

This means that the life she evicts must be able to survive outside the womb.

Technology keeps getting better and better at keeping a human alive outside the womb.

So whenever a woman chooses to abort a pregnancy, it is perfectly fine as long as it doesn't kill or harm the human life she evicts.

Simple.
Moral.
And it protects the Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness RIGHTS of the unborn.