Pro-Trump PAC Hires Our Boy Jesse Benton

BaneMaler Fri, 03/11/2016 - 15:17

Gun for hire and I hear he is being re-indicted for the Iowa payoff.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/trackers/2016-03-11/pro-trump-pac-hire...

What is the category of this post? (choose up to 2): 
BaneMaler's picture
About the author
Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. Never Be Defeated! https://youtu.be/XmTmTMcdxOs
Freedom Express's picture

Trump, is a shrewd, 'been around the block' in Manhattan, business man, not a respectful relative. He wants to draw in the 'controlled operatives' to learn how to beat them. In the political game, you learn how to play along with the system. I recall, Ron, backing GOP candidates opposed to his views, because he had to show support to the party.

I don't truly agree with Trump on some issues, but he is a tough guy, whom, like Rockwell applauds, all the 'bad guys' hate. We need a transitional person to go from Corporatist to Constitutional free market? If you know the facts about Putin, he played the globalist 'game' the first time around, all the while, paying down the Fed/Rothschild-Zionist destructive debt? Now, he is the champion of the Russian people, with almost 90% approval rating, striving to escape the Rothschild/BIS/Fed Dollar ponzi reserve system, that issssdestroy

Ron, and lesser, Rand, have the ideology we aspire, but Ron nor Rand, can make the transitional phase? 'A' is ultimate, but there has to be a transitional phase, and it takes a 'tough guy' who is willing to risk a bullet to break the fraud. Ron, had courage, but lacked in a transitional know how, and Rand, is just plain weak. Do you really want me to recount Rand's cowardice?

.

BaneMaler's picture

I'll address you anyways but I think you are wrong about the type of person needed to "transition". That is a tactical calculation on your part and does not guarantee the results you believe will happen such as a free market from a tough guy. History has shown quite the opposite. This tactic is better known as the ends justifying the means. If I elect a wrecking ball he will help me by knocking the state into its footprint. Maybe? But what if they don't deliver? There is risk there. What if they do deliver and you are on the floor they target first with their wrecking ball (Constitutionalists floor)or the (antiwar lobby). Then your pet project gets flattened to make way for a more repressive state of existence.

Its hard to predict what people will do when they have no record. Records matter most to me. I would say that if rhetoric was a persons record and their word mattered anymore in this world, what you say about Trump is a mixed bag. He is a more petulant flip flopper than even Mitt Romney. But if your only goal is to destroy a Party that pissed you off in the past then I don't disagree with you that such an outcome is likely casting a vote for Trump. Just don't share your view of this transition or that a strong person is the tough guy in the room.

I think Ron Paul was the perfect balance. He just didn't have the platform that Trump has. You are giving very little credit to the power of the media over the masses. An asset never afforded to either Paul.

Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
Never Be Defeated! https://youtu.be/XmTmTMcdxOs