Paulite_2012 spreading smack.

Ron Aldof Wed, 12/23/2015 - 01:45

I really can't believe he is going around talking this smack. Shows the childishness of his political leanings. Trying to back stab the same people he was aligned with in the last election because he has a different political outlook this time. Looks like he wants to push Rand Paul supporters away from his site. Wouldn't you say?

Feel more should go to the EX Daily Paul and explain that this site is for liberty and anything to do with it.

 

"Paulite_2012 replied on Mon, 12/21/2015 - 03:48

new

+1
+1

-1

I wanted to let you know that your posts will be more than welcomed at our site (The Liberty Report), which is still under construction.

I've checked out the newest site that's been completed 'A Call to Paul. They have done a nice job, and in record time creating a PL replacement site. It's nice looking, organized, and apparently well received.

But unless you're a sold-out Rand Paul person you will not be accepted there. That is very obvious. The hateful, spiteful bunch who tried to rule the PL here, have definitely migrated there. The hateful things being said about Michael Nystrom are appalling.

Which is too bad, because I do not see the site as being or projecting liberty what-so-ever, but just the opposite. To fear being able to bring or say anything good about another candidate, other than Rand, gives me the chills. Everyone is a little Hitler except themselves. I hate it with a passion.

I can never make such a place my home. A place where you're expected to tow 'their' mark, or be mocked, belittled, and ridiculed into submission. Many there, are outright verbal bullies from here. I can see why Michael is closing this place, and why he wouldn't sell it. As his name was one it!

I almost called my programmer today [before thoroughly checking out their site] to say, let's put our's on hold, as another site has already emerged, that will serve us well. But after reading the comments about Micheal, I realize there's no room for the likes of anyone like me, who is not completely sold out to Rand, and Rand only.

It was kind of naive to think other wise, when the site is called 'A Call to Paul'. I do wish them well, but it's not for me!

Our site will not be as popular as there's is (because of user numbers), but it will be a site where people will have the liberty to post their thoughts freely, hopefully without the harassment we've seen here.

We will have a signup-page coming out in a day or two, if you're interested."

http://popularliberty.com/13083/what-i-love-most-about-pl

What is the category of this post? (choose up to 2): 
Ron Aldof's picture
About the author
#IStandWithRandAndLiberty! Let's get back to Liberty and Freedom. Trump is working with the Establishment.
ecard71's picture

Curious, what venom were you talking about? Was it the Legalize Liberty thread?

I'm trying to take my own advice. http://www.acalltopaul.com/comment/767#comment-767

And it's very hard to do after TRYING so many times previously on PL - LOL.

I STILL STAND WITH RAND!

crabacado's picture

and I knew this already about here

Was trying to make a point.

We can engage respectfully, with civility.

Not really sure what's up with the venom spewing already, I have a feeling the Lt. is here though

A man who chops his own wood is warmed by it twice

crabacado's picture

Some battles carrying over from the past?

Only speaking for myself, but I want to be able to post what ever I want, on any subject matter that interests me.

If bernie sanders said he wanted to end the fed and the drug war on day one I might want to post something about it.

 

I support Rand but what's all this nasty stuff going on here?

A man who chops his own wood is warmed by it twice

ecard71's picture

I welcome it as well as long as it's done in a respectful manner. Months ago I was asked on PL if Rand wasn't running - and gun to my head - who would I choose from the current GOP field. I answered Ben Carson at the time (or just pull the trigger).

I think we can all agree that we're here to promote LIBERTY, correct? Well if Sanders, Trump, or Hillary suddenly started promoting it, that'd be great! I don't see an issue with pointing out the Pro's of a candidate, but be prepared if challenged on that candidates stance on LIBERTY platforms.

This site has stated the following:

We aim to support liberty ideals and all the candidates that promote them. - See more at: http://www.acalltopaul.com/node/8#sthash.56MjggJS.dpuf
 
At this point in time, this site Stands with Rand. But the site is first and foremost about promoting Liberty. You should check out the link & guidelines.
 
And in case you were referring to my previous "nonsense" comment; please see my reply to bunny below since I seemed to confuse a couple of threads here.

I STILL STAND WITH RAND!

Anne's picture

We should absolutely call attention to when politicians get it right even if we don't always agree with them on every subject.

There has to be room for understanding people as sometimes on the right track and sometimes completely off the mark. 

We don't have to support them for office to support a few ot their actions.  In my opinion that's how liberty gets promoted

"Do not neglect your music, it will be a companion which will sweeten many hours of life to you."  Thomas Jefferson

TheTaoistTroll's picture

by the fruit he bears. Time will tell, as it always has and will.  That and there is nothing wrong with a little competition, we are all ascribe to an ideology that promotes it.  Makes us all better people, and will make at least one possible both sites amazing bastions for liberty and Love.

Those who are; are those whom are not.

ecard71's picture

when one site promotes Liberty and another promotes Authoritarian views. Ultimately, it'll come down to the content.

I STILL STAND WITH RAND!

ecard71's picture

I didn't bother looking at his post or website, because I expected nothing less. After countless debates with him and others (and banging my head on the keyboard) that support trump, I frankly gave up on them. And to be clear, I don't easily give up on people - where is when I start to suspect that some are just paid disinfo agents. The replies most of them gave left me wondering. Paulite stated he was a Christian, but IMHO he needs to work on humility & hypocrisy, specially after stating that his new site's motto will be "The freedom to express yourself, even if you're wrong!" Really???

I STILL STAND WITH RAND!

Ron Aldof's picture

Okay

#IStandWithRandAndLiberty!
Let's get back to Liberty and Freedom.
Trump is working with the Establishment.

Isabella sj's picture

For the hard work and dedication to liberty and the future of this Nation.  Yes, let's be civil, focused on the hard job of preserving freedom and leave the negative behind. Division will bring more of the same.  Peace shall become alive again.  Take doom and gloom to the recycling bin. Amen.  Let freedom rise. Merry xmas, happy new year and dont forget three kings day on the 6th. Hardly celebrated by the marketing machine. Lol

I went to Popular Liberty looking for silver education and I got GOLD. Thank YOU Question more. https://youtu.be/3eA4OHW8v2k https://youtu.be/mgm8qYEFKwc

Chris's picture

Did you amen yourself? 

LibertyUserName's picture

Did you guys ever stop to think one reason liberty isnt popular is because you all act like fucking children?

Anne's picture

I have no love for erasing posts but this is not a site for attacking people.

If you are going to wage personal attacks then your posts will be erased

If it becomes a continual problem, your account will be erased.

Site rules clearly state no personal attacks.  Play by the rules or move on

"Do not neglect your music, it will be a companion which will sweeten many hours of life to you."  Thomas Jefferson

rftbunny's picture

Please elaborate on this. What personal attacks? Are you referring to the whole thread .. the original post about someone attacking us on another site? It's unclear.

.

ecard71's picture

I have a habit of usually having multiple tabs opened at once. I may have confused this thread - with this one:

http://www.acalltopaul.com/content/rand-will-win-iowa-mark-my-words

And as you can see, it was the same user who made the "fucking children" remark above. I guess that makes it strike two (from what I've seen anyway).

I STILL STAND WITH RAND!

ecard71's picture

(unless I'm on a different thread?) Someone called someone else a couple of derogatory names.

I STILL STAND WITH RAND!

ecard71's picture

This nonsense has got to be nipped on the bud.

I STILL STAND WITH RAND!

LibertyUserName's picture

This whole thread? Or what about a whole thread where the comments are basically an attack on someone else?

Do you really not realize the irony of saying 'please stop the attacks' in a thread that is set up to attack someone and is being accepted?

Yes please nip it in the bud if you don't agree with it or don't see how foolish it looks. After all that is liberty...ignoring your faults and trying to silence others who point them out.

ecard71's picture

That's the "nonsense" I'm talking about. Someone here called someone else a couple of names. Did you miss it?

 

Then again, maybe Anne was referring to the "acting like fucking children" comment above?

I STILL STAND WITH RAND!

ATruepatriot's picture

Could you please elaborate on this a little more for us? :)

"Jack of all Trades...Master of None" But forever learning more!

Pages