Does anyone think for a MINUTE that if there was an uprising against the U.S. government...

pawnstorm12 Mon, 04/10/2017 - 01:36

...that they would not hesitate for a MOMENT to use ANY MEAN POSSIBLE to quench it - up to and including CHEMICAL WEAPONS?

END OF SUBJECT.

What is the category of this post? (choose up to 2): 
pawnstorm12's picture
About the author
"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed and over-regulated and overrun by bureaucrats - the founders would be ashamed." -Ron Paul
pawnstorm12's picture

In fact the U.S. government would go to ANY means necessary to put an end to a revolt against it.

Torture, murder, imprisonment, chemical weapons etc...

EVEN if it was a CONSTITUTIONAL and PRINCIPLED reason to overturn our ROTTED government.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed and over-regulated and overrun by bureaucrats - the founders would be ashamed." -Ron Paul

mwstroberg's picture

They wouldn't hesitate for a moment to use these.

.

jdayh's picture

... oh never mind.

"I predict a Donald Trump landslide"
Jdayh

stm's picture

We've used depleted uranium all over the place. As SHillary says, "What difference does it make?"
It's that freakin' McMaster - he needs to be fired.

Laugh. It makes you feel good.

Strings's picture

By the Neocon's rule book (Section 1: Paragraph 1), it's only an Act of War or Aggression when "someone else" does it to us. When "we" do it to someone else, we're making the world... a Better Place.

Luke 6:31 .. "Do to others as you would have them do to you." .. can be made into a blessing .. or a curse. The Neocons we have been supporting are making it unquestionably.. a Curse.

Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but expose them. Ephesians 5:11

Libera_me's picture

Jesus, (or Yeshua) was referring to the Older Covenant, where in Leviticus 19:18 one can find this exact wording. the full context even goes so far as to explain that if the donkey or ox of one who hates you is found by you, you shall return it to him. If it were left in context it would be more than an 'adequate axiom', it would exemplify not simply the Zero Aggression Principle, but an even higher standard.

https://www.zeroaggressionproject.org/principles/does-the-golden-rule-ha...

Speak up for those who cannot speak up for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly, defend the rights of the poor and the needy.~~ Prov.30: 8 & 9